| Type | Global league |
| Doctrine | Global human rights and freedom from discrimination or oppression |
| Emphasis | Human rights protection and enforcement |
| Formation | End of the Second World War |
| Controversies | Methods of human rights enforcement |
| Member states | Various nations |
| Enforcement methods | Sanctions • peacekeeping forces • other methods |
| International influence | Shaping international governance and the place of human rights |
The protection of human rights has been a central focus of international law and politics since the end of the Second World War. After witnessing atrocities on a global scale, the international community recognized the need to prioritize and protect the inherent dignity and fundamental rights of all people.
Following the end of the Second World War, the newly victorious nations met to establish a new global order based on respect for human rights and the avoidance of future wars. This effort culminated in the foundation of the United Nations Protective Authority (UNPA), a non-state global league that worked to ensure the maintenance of peace, stability and human rights compliance.
The UNPA based its human rights doctrine on two principles drawn from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: the right to life and the inherent dignity of every human being. According to the UNPA, all human beings have a right to life and to be free from discrimination or oppression based on nationality, ethnicity, sex, religion, or any other personal belief or identity.
The UNPA sought to enforce its doctrine on human rights through economic and diplomatic sanctions, legal action, and peacekeeping forces. It aimed to hold countries accountable for their treatment of their citizens and to intervene when necessary to protect the rights and dignity of all people.
The UNPA required countries to subscribe to its doctrine, affirming adherence and membership in its organization to be recognized by the global community. Countries that failed to adhere faced a range of consequences, from loss of prestige to economic sanctions to military intervention.
The UNPA's method of human rights enforcement was not without controversy. Critics argued that the organization was a form of neocolonialism, with powerful nations imposing their values on others. They also challenged the validity of the UNPA's doctrine, arguing that it was a Western-centric view of human rights.
However, supporters argued that the UNPA's doctrine was a universal standard that prioritized the inherent dignity of every human being. They also pointed to the UNPA's success in preventing wars and promoting stability, which they attributed to its focus on human rights.
The UNPA's emphasis on human rights protection has had a profound impact on global governance. It has helped to shape the rules and norms of international law, particularly in areas such as humanitarian intervention and justice. The UNPA has also helped to establish a global culture of human rights, which has spread to countries and communities around the world.
In this vein, the UNPA has led numerous efforts to protect and promote human rights. These have included working to end genocide, child slavery, and apartheid, as well as efforts to promote education, health, and sustainable development. While it has faced controversies and challenges, the UNPA's commitment to human rights remains a central component of its mission.
